"Why is the Trump Administration working so hard to allow these untraceable, undetectable 3D-printed guns to be available to domestic abusers, felons and terrorists?" Ferguson diy garden netting said. They also said the Trump administration had failed to explain why it settled the case.Lasnik said the states have submitted sufficient evidence that they are likely to suffer "irreparable harm" if the blueprints are published. 1, it did so a few days before Lasnik issued the initial temporary ban. That ban was due to expire on Tuesday and the new one will remain in place until the case is resolved. may also prompt a reconsideration of the decision," Lasnik said..A US federal judge on Monday extended a ban on the online distribution of 3-D printed gun blueprints, a win for a group of mainly Democratic-led states that said such a publication would violate their right to regulate firearms as well as endanger their residents.Gun control proponents are concerned the weapons made from 3-D printers will be untraceable, undetectable "ghost" firearms that pose a threat to global security.A group of 19 US states and the District of Columbia sued the US government in July, arguing that publishing the blueprints would allow criminals easy access to weapons.Although Defense Distributed originally had said it would put the files on the internet on Aug.As recently as April, the government in court filings argued downloadable guns would allow extremist groups and criminals abroad unfettered access to arms.The files include 3-D printable blueprints for components that would go into the making of a version of the AR-15 semi-automatic assault rifle, a weapon that has been used in US mass shootings. They also say undetectable guns wholly made of plastic are illegal in the United States. The blueprints continue to be available on several other websites.Monday’s decision blocks a settlement between the Trump administration and Defense Distributed, a group that argues access to the online blueprints is guaranteed under the US Constitution’s First and Second Amendments, which protect free speech and the right to bear arms, respectively. Some gun rights groups say the technology is expensive, the guns are unreliable and the threat is overblown.Lasnik’s prior order, issued on July 31, blocked the release of the blueprints hours before they were set to hit the internet. The judge also said Defense Distributed’s First Amendment concerns were "dwarfed" by the states’ safety considerations.The US State Department, which had previously banned the blueprints as a national security risk and a violation of arms trafficking regulations, also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson, who led the states’ lawsuit, said in a statement that he was glad about the decision, but criticized the federal government."Forcing the federal defendants to evaluate the effect of the proposed delisting on world peace, national security, and the foreign policy of the United States ..A lawyer for the group said it is currently reviewing the judge’s decision and considering all options.US District Judge Robert Lasnik in Seattle issued the extension of a nationwide injunction, blocking a Texas-based group from disseminating files for printing plastic weapons on the internet.(Source).Defense Distributed founder Cody Wilson called Lasnik’s decision an "intentional insult."Lasnik on Monday said the government had failed to comply with procedural rules that mandate a 30-day notice period to the US Congress before allowing the files’ dissemination.But a lawyer for the State Department said in a court hearing last month that the government had determined in May that the types of guns featured in Defense Distributed’s blueprints did not pose a national security risk as they can be bought "in any store." "The order is a manifest injustice and literally admits to being an abridgment of the freedom of speech," Wilson said in a statement.

.But the increase in the availability of consumer goods has also caused waste levels to skyrocket, clogging city streets, fields and alleyways.Just five minutes away lies the towns eyesore of a garbage dump, where piles of putrid rubbish spread over a vast expanse of land roughly equivalent to two football pitches.Dala, Myanmar: With creative flair the Myanmar-based social enterprise "Chu Chu" lets little go to waste as its staff turn discarded clothes and rubbish into handy accessories that get snapped up by tourists."They just dont understand that throwing plastics away is disastrous," the 66-year-old says."Myanmar has seen a huge spurt in development over the last few years after emerging from half a century plastic netting for gardens of junta rule in 2011."Were trying to change the way of thinking that recycled things are old and dirty," explains Canadian volunteer and product developer Debra Martyn.Chu Chu, which means "plastic" in Burmese, started in 2013 with just two workers.Now it employs 45 local women and their products sell at souvenir shops in Yangon and across the country.For the moment, most customers are foreign tourists as Myanmar is still a long way from embracing recycling or recycled products, says managing director Wendy Neampui.Even the shop itself is made from reused waste.Coffee sacks are woven into baskets and old tyres are refashioned as belts -- just some of the 60 products on offer at the organisations shop in Dala, a short ferry ride from the bustling downtown of commercial hub Yangon."We try to make things that are good quality, well constructed, nicely designed and beautiful -- and can be considered useful.Plastic bottles cemented together form the walls and a roof made from old tyres provides insulation and protection during the punishing seasonal changes.The team suffers no shortage of raw materials.

Reddy’s family members, present at the hospital, grew suspicious as Reddy was a non-vegetarian and he liked mutton soup. M Swati had allegedly murdered her husband Sudhakar Reddy and convinced her lover to disfigure his own face with acid and get a plastic surgery done so he could replace Reddy.Rajesh will be arrested after he is discharged from the hospital, police said.The family members then approached the plastic gutter mesh police, which took Rajesh’s fingerprints to match them against the Aadhaar database..Police interrogated Swati, who confessed to killing her husband and revealed her plans to present Rajesh as Reddy.The reel-like murder plot unfolded on November 27 as Swati and Rajesh, a physiotherapist, allegedly injected anaesthesia into Reddy, bludgeoned him to death and burnt his body in a forest. The result came negative, prompting the police to start and investigation.Things became much clearer as Reddy’s family began noticing differences in Rajeshs behaviour and started testing him.Swati later smeared acid on her lovers face and passed him off as her husband to her family stating that he was attacked by some unidentified people.Taking cue from Telugu movie Evadu, where actor Allu Arjun undergoes plastic surgery to resemble another character, Swati conspired with her lover Rajesh to kill her husband and get his property, according to reports. She was arrested on Sunday.Rajesh, who pretended to be Swatis husband Reddy, was admitted to Apollo Hospitals in Hyderabad for treatment. He then stopped talking to them and started communicating with signs.But the plan began to fall apart when nurses at the hospital offered Rajesh mutton soup, which he refused saying that he was a vegetarian.Hyderabad: In a bizarre end to a well-planned murder, mutton soup served at a Hyderabad hospital exposed the crime committed by a 27-year-old woman and her lover.Also read: Wife kills husband, convinces lover to pour acid on own face to replace himSwati, a nurse at a private hospital in Nagarkurnool town of Hyderabad, was married to Sudhakar Reddy for three years and had two children.